Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
2.
Pharmacogenomics ; 22(12): 761-776, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34467776

RESUMEN

The application of pharmacogenomics could meaningfully contribute toward medicines optimization within primary care. This review identified 13 studies describing eight implementation models utilizing a multi-gene pharmacogenomic panel within a primary care or community setting. These were small feasibility studies (n <200). They demonstrated importance and feasibility of pre-test counseling, the role of the pharmacist, data integration into the electronic medical record and point-of-care clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Findings were considered alongside existing primary care prescribing practices and implementation frameworks to demonstrate how issues may be addressed by existing nationalized healthcare and primary care infrastructure. Development of point-of-care CDSS should be prioritized; establishing clinical leadership, education programs, defining practitioner roles and responsibilities and addressing commissioning issues will also be crucial.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas/tendencias , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Farmacéuticos/normas , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Farmacogenética/métodos , Farmacogenética/normas , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/normas , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias
4.
Pharmacogenomics ; 22(11): 681-691, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34137665

RESUMEN

Several healthcare organizations across Minnesota have developed formal pharmacogenomic (PGx) clinical programs to increase drug safety and effectiveness. Healthcare professional and student education is strong and there are multiple opportunities in the state for learners to gain workforce skills and develop advanced competency in PGx. Implementation planning is occurring at several organizations and others have incorporated structured utilization of PGx into routine workflows. Laboratory-based and translational PGx research in Minnesota has driven important discoveries in several therapeutic areas. This article reviews the state of PGx activities in Minnesota including educational programs, research, national consortia involvement, technology, clinical implementation and utilization and reimbursement, and outlines the challenges and opportunities in equitable implementation of these advances.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Farmacia , Personal de Salud/educación , Farmacogenética/educación , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Farmacia/tendencias , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Minnesota , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias
5.
Pharmacogenomics ; 22(3): 177-190, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517770

RESUMEN

Pharmacogenetics represents a major driver of precision medicine, promising individualized drug selection and dosing. Traditionally, pharmacogenetic profiling has been performed using targeted genotyping that focuses on common/known variants. Recently, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is emerging as a more comprehensive short-read next-generation sequencing approach, enabling both gene diagnostics and pharmacogenetic profiling, including rare/novel variants, in a single assay. Using the example of the pharmacogene CYP2D6, we demonstrate the potential of WGS-based pharmacogenetic profiling as well as emphasize the limitations of short-read next-generation sequencing. In the near future, we envision a shift toward long-read sequencing as the predominant method for gene diagnostics and pharmacogenetic profiling, providing unprecedented data quality and improving patient care.


Asunto(s)
Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/métodos , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/tendencias , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/tendencias , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/tendencias
6.
Pharmacogenomics ; 22(3): 125-135, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33601907

RESUMEN

Aim: To assess the impact of sociodemographic factors and beliefs about medicines on the uptake of pharmacogenomic testing in older adults in a public healthcare system. Materials & methods: Data are based on a sample of 347 primary care older adults. Results: Most respondents (90%) were willing to provide a saliva sample and 47% were willing to pay for it. Increased age (odds ratio: 0.91; p = 0.04) and negative beliefs about the harmfulness of medicines (odds ratio: 0.68; p = 0.02) were associated with a decreased willingness to provide a sample. Lower education (less than university, odds ratio: 0.54; p = 0.04) was associated with a decreased willingness to pay. Conclusion: Education and beliefs about medicines are important factors in the acceptability of pharmacogenomic testing in older adults.


Asunto(s)
Cultura , Gastos en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Pharmacogenomics ; 22(3): 137-144, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33403869

RESUMEN

In 2019, the Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated US healthcare system, started the Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program that provides multi-gene pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for up to 250,000 veterans at approximately 50 sites. PHASER is staggering program initiation at sites over a 5-year period from 2019 to 2023, as opposed to simultaneous initiation at all sites, to facilitate iterative program quality improvements through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Current resources in the PGx field have not focused on multisite, remote implementation of panel-based PGx testing. In addition to bringing large scale PGx testing to veterans, the PHASER program is developing a roadmap to maximize uptake and optimize the use of PGx to improve drug response outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Veteranos , Veteranos , Humanos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/tendencias , Servicios de Salud para Veteranos/tendencias
8.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 21(1): 1-7, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32843688

RESUMEN

The implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has come a long way since the dawn of utilizing pharmacogenomic data in clinical patient care. However, the potential benefits of sharing PGx results have yet to be explored. In this paper, we explore the willingness of patients to share PGx results, as well as the inclusion of family medication history in identifying potential family members for pharmacogenomics cascade testing (PhaCT). The genetic similarities in families allow for identifying potential gene variants prior to official preemptive testing. Once a candidate patient is determined, PhaCT can be initiated. PhaCT recognizes that further cascade testing throughout a family can serve to improve precision medicine. In order to make PhaCT feasible, we propose a novel shareable HIPAA-compliant informatics platform that will enable patients to manage not only their own test results and medications but also those of their family members. The informatics platform will be an external genomics system with capabilities to integrate with patients' electronic health records. Patients will be given the tools to provide information to and work with clinicians in identifying family members for PhaCT through this platform. Offering patients the tools to share PGx results with their family members for preemptive testing could be the key to empowering patients. Clinicians can utilize PhaCT to potentially improve medication adherence, which may consequently help to distribute the burden of health management between patients, family members, providers, and payers.


Asunto(s)
Genómica , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Medicina de Precisión
9.
Clin Transl Sci ; 14(1): 113-119, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33089968

RESUMEN

Interindividual variability in drug efficacy and toxicity is a major challenge in clinical practice. Variations in drug pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) can be, in part, explained by polymorphic variants in genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) or in genes encoding drug receptors. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has allowed the identification of predictive biomarkers of drug PKs and PDs and the current knowledge of genome-disease and genome-drug interactions offers the opportunity to optimize tailored drug therapy. High-throughput PGx genotyping, from targeted to more comprehensive strategies, allows the identification of PK/PD genotypes to be developed as clinical predictive biomarkers. However, a biomarker needs a robust process of validation followed by clinical-grade assay development and must comply to stringent regulatory guidelines. We here discuss the methodological challenges and the emerging technological tools in PGx biomarker discovery and validation, at the crossroad among molecular genetics, bioinformatics, and clinical medicine.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/análisis , Farmacogenética/métodos , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/métodos , Biología Computacional/métodos , Biología Computacional/tendencias , Interacciones Farmacológicas/genética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Técnicas de Genotipaje/instrumentación , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Farmacogenética/instrumentación , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/instrumentación , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Variantes Farmacogenómicas , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/instrumentación , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/tendencias , Estudios de Validación como Asunto
10.
PLoS Med ; 17(9): e1003344, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32956352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large sample sizes are often required to detect statistically significant associations between pharmacogenetic markers and treatment response. Meta-analysis may be performed to synthesize data from several studies, increasing sample size and, consequently, power to detect significant genetic effects. However, performing robust synthesis of data from pharmacogenetic studies is often challenging because of poor reporting of key data in study reports. There is currently no guideline for the reporting of pharmacogenetic studies that has been developed using a widely accepted robust methodology. The objective of this project was to develop the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We established a preliminary checklist of reporting items to be considered for inclusion in the guideline. We invited representatives of key stakeholder groups to participate in a 2-round Delphi survey. A total of 52 individuals participated in both rounds of the survey, scoring items with regards to their importance for inclusion in the STROPS guideline. We then held a consensus meeting, at which 8 individuals considered the results of the Delphi survey and voted on whether each item ought to be included in the final guideline. The STROPS guideline consists of 54 items and is accompanied by an explanation and elaboration document. The guideline contains items that are particularly important in the field of pharmacogenetics, such as the drug regimen of interest and whether adherence to treatment was accounted for in the conducted analyses. The guideline also requires that outcomes be clearly defined and justified, because in pharmacogenetic studies, there may be a greater number of possible outcomes than in other types of study (for example, disease-gene association studies). A limitation of this project is that our consensus meeting involved a small number of individuals, the majority of whom are based in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS: Our aim is for the STROPS guideline to improve the transparency of reporting of pharmacogenetic studies and also to facilitate the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We encourage authors to adhere to the STROPS guideline when publishing pharmacogenetic studies.


Asunto(s)
Farmacogenética/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/normas , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Adulto , Lista de Verificación , Consenso , Técnica Delfos , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Objetivos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacogenética/normas , Política , Edición/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Participación de los Interesados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
11.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 18(3): 0-0, jul.-sept. 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-194197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While pharmacists are well positioned to implement pharmacogenomic testing in healthcare systems, uptake has been limited. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this survey was to determine how post-graduate education and training influences pharmacist's knowledge and attitudes of pharmacogenomic testing. METHODS: Survey questions were developed by the study team, and responses were collected electronically using REDCapTM. The electronic survey was sent to all pharmacists (n=161) within a large, multi-state healthcare system by email. RESULTS: A total of 75 (47%) respondents completed all aspects of the survey. The majority of respondents were female (60%), worked in acute care settings (57%), were full-time employees (80%), and worked in an urban area (85%), with many graduating in or after 2010 (43%). For post-graduate education, 36% of respondents completed a Post-Graduate Year One Residency (PGY-1), and 27% had a board certification. Those that completed a PGY-1 residency were significantly more likely to have received formal training or education on pharmacogenomics than those who had not. They also assessed their own knowledge of pharmacogenomic resources and guidelines higher than those without PGY-1 training. More recent graduates were also significantly more likely to have received formal training or education on pharmacogenomics. Additionally, pharmacists who completed a PGY-1 residency were more likely to respond favorably to pharmacogenomics being offered through pharmacy services. Pharmacists with board certification were more comfortable interpreting results of a pharmacogenomic test than those without board certification. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists who have completed a PGY-1 residency or received board certification appear more comfortable with interpretation and implementation of pharmacogenomic testing


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Farmacogenética/educación , Servicios Farmacéuticos/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis de Datos
12.
Psychiatry Res ; 292: 113336, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739644

RESUMEN

In this narrative, we evaluate the role of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry from a pragmatic clinical perspective and address current barriers of clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenetics has been successfully implemented to improve drug therapy in several clinical areas, but not psychiatry. Yet, psychotropics account for more than one-third of the drugs for which pharmacogenetic guidelines are available and drug therapy in mental disorders is suboptimal with insufficient effectiveness and frequent adverse events. The limited application of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry is influenced by several factors; e.g. the complexity of psychotropic drug metabolism, possibly impeding the clinical understanding of the benefits of pharmacogenetics. Also, recommendations for most psychotropics classify pharmacogenetic testing only as (potentially) beneficial, not as essential, possibly because life-threatening adverse events are often not involved in these drug-gene interactions. Implementing pharmacogenetics in psychiatry could improve the current practice of time-consuming switching of therapies causing undue delays associated with worse outcomes. We expect pharmacogenetics in psychiatry to expedite with panel-based genotyping, including clinically relevant variants, which will address the complex enzymatic metabolism of psychotropic drugs. Until then, we stress that available pharmacogenetic testing should be seen as an integrated companion, not a competitor, in current clinical psychiatric care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Farmacogenética/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Psiquiatría/métodos , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/tendencias , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico
13.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(11): 785-796, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748688

RESUMEN

Pharmacogenomics test coverage and reimbursement are major obstacles to clinical uptake. Several early adopter programs have been successfully initiated through dedicated investments by federal and institutional research funding. As a result of research endeavors, evidence has grown sufficiently to support development of pharmacogenomics guidelines. However, clinical uptake is still limited. Third-party payer support plays an important role in increasing adoption, which to date has been limited to reactive single-gene testing. Access to and interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing are driving demand for increasing healthcare providers and third-party awareness of this burgeoning field. Pharmacogenomics implementation models developed by early adopters promise to expand patient access and options, as testing continues to increase due to growing consumer interest and falling test prices.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/tendencias , Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Asistencia Médica/economía , Asistencia Médica/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/economía , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias
14.
Per Med ; 17(4): 283-293, 2020 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589098

RESUMEN

Aim: To survey the general public about whole genome sequencing interest, including pharmacogenomic testing, and to identify information important for sequencing decisions. Patients & methods: An online survey of 901 members of the general public in an eastern Canadian province. Results: Interest in whole genome sequencing, including pharmacogenomic testing, was high with few differences among demographic variables. Issues identified as very important to sequencing decisions included familial implications of testing, whether treatment was available for conditions tested and knowing who could access genomic information. Most respondents would value support when interpreting sequencing results. Conclusion: Findings reveal the kind of information and support users of sequencing services would value and could inform the implementation of sequencing into care in ways that accord with public preferences and needs.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Genómica/métodos , Genómica/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 20(6): 801-812, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32457399

RESUMEN

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing, which aims to identify the genes that affect our responses to drugs, has been favoured by healthcare professionals as a means of maximising drug efficacy and improving the safety and cost-effectiveness of healthcare. Support from the public is needed to determine the successful development of this technology and its implementation in society. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to analyse factors that influence stakeholders' intentions to adopt pharmacogenomic testing in Malaysia. A validated instrument was administered through face-to-face interviews with a total of 421 adult respondents who were stratified according to 2 stakeholder groups: healthcare providers (n = 221) and patients/family members (n = 200). The data were then analysed using SPSS® version 24 software and the advanced multivariate statistical approach of Partial Least Square (PLS) path modelling in order to analyse the complex relationships among variables. Results of the studies indicated that the Malaysian stakeholders had a high amount of trust in the key players (mean score of 5.31), perceived high benefits (mean score of 5.53) and claimed to have high intentions of adopting PGx (mean score of 5.39). The majority of the predictors have significant direct relationships with the intention to adopt PGx, with the exception of moral concerns. Perceived benefits appeared to be the most important direct predictor of the intention to adopt PGx testing (ß = 0.371, P < 0.001) followed by trust in the key players (ß = 0.312, P < 0.001), engagement (ß = 0.272, P < 0.001) and religiosity (ß = 0.133, P < 0.01). In addition, perceived risks also had a direct negative association with the intention to adopt PGx (ß = -0.096, P < 0.05). At the same time, the perceived benefits also served as a mediator for all the other factors except risk. The results provide insights into the multidimensional nature of the determinants of the intention to adopt PGx testing in Malaysia. Although the results showed that the stakeholders in Malaysia were very positive towards PGx testing, they were also cautious about it. The predictors identified in this study can serve as indicators for social acceptance of PGx testing to facilitate the clinical research and implementation of PGx.


Asunto(s)
Intención , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Religión y Psicología , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Adulto Joven
16.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(8): 549-557, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32378980

RESUMEN

This narrative review describes implementation, current status and perspectives of a pharmacogenomic (PGx) program at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), targeting the cancer chemotherapeutic drugs - fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and thiopurines. This initiative, designed as a research project, was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. A dedicated task force developed standard operational procedures from recruitment of patients to creating PGx reports with dosing recommendations, which were successfully applied to test 100 gastrointestinal cancer INCA outpatients and 162 acute lymphoblastic leukemia pediatric patients from INCA and seven other hospitals. The program has been subsequently expanded to include gastrointestinal cancer patients from three additional cancer treatment centers. We anticipate implementation of routine pre-emptive PGx testing at INCA but acknowledge challenges associated with this transition, such as continuous financing support, availability of trained personnel, adoption of the PGx-informed prescription by the clinical staff and, ultimately, evidence of cost-effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Agencias Gubernamentales/tendencias , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Antineoplásicos/economía , Brasil/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/tendencias , Agencias Gubernamentales/economía , Humanos , Neoplasias/economía , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía
17.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(6): 411-418, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308127

RESUMEN

Aim: To investigate the current state of TPMT testing at a single-academic medical center. Methods: Single-center, retrospective chart review for patients newly prescribed a thiopurine. Data collection and evaluation included the prevalence and timing of TPMT testing, correct dosage adjustment if applicable, and incidence of myelosuppression. Results: 121 patients (71%) received TPMT testing. Out of the tested patients, 110 (90.9%) were designated as wild-type with normal metabolism. Dosing modification was appropriate in applicable patients. In unadjusted analysis, there was a lower incidence of myelosuppression among patients who were tested versus those who were not (16.5 vs 36.7%). Conclusion: Based on the study results, TPMT testing opportunities exist for nearly 30% of patients. Testing may reduce the incidence of myelosuppression.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Metiltransferasas/genética , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Azatioprina/metabolismo , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mercaptopurina/administración & dosificación , Mercaptopurina/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Farmacogenética/métodos , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(7): 431-441, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32343201

RESUMEN

Aim:CYP2C19 genotyping is used to guide antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study evaluated the potential impact of CYP2C19 and multigene pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing on medications beyond antiplatelet therapy in a real-world cohort of PCI patients that underwent CYP2C19 testing. Methodology & results: Multiple medications with actionable PGx recommendations, including proton pump inhibitors, antidepressants and opioids, were commonly prescribed. Approximately 50% received a CYP2C19 metabolized medication beyond clopidogrel and 7% met criteria for a CYP2C19 genotype-guided intervention. A simulation analysis projected that 17.5 PGx-guided medication interventions per 100 PCI patients could have been made if multigene PGx results were available. Conclusion: This suggests that CYP2C19 and multigene PGx results could be used to optimize medication prescribing beyond antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients.


Asunto(s)
Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Anciano , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Farmacogenética/métodos , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ticagrelor/administración & dosificación , Ticagrelor/efectos adversos
19.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(7): 471-486, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32338137

RESUMEN

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled the discovery of a multitude of novel and mostly rare variants in pharmacogenes that may alter a patient's therapeutic response to drugs. In addition to single nucleotide variants, structural variation affecting the number of copies of whole genes or parts of genes can be detected. While current guidelines concerning clinical implementation mostly act upon well-documented, common single nucleotide variants to guide dosing or drug selection, in silico and large-scale functional assessment of rare variant effects on protein function are at the forefront of pharmacogenetic research to facilitate their clinical integration. Here, we discuss the role of NGS in variant discovery, paving the way for more comprehensive genotype-guided pharmacotherapy that can translate to improved clinical care.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador/tendencias , Variación Genética/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/tendencias , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Predicción , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos
20.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 20(2): 155-161, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31985545

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Childhood asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease comprising different phenotypes and endotypes and, particularly in its severe forms, has a large impact on the quality-of-life of patients and caregivers. The application of advanced omics technologies provides useful insights into underlying asthma endotypes and may provide potential clinical biomarkers to guide treatment and move towards a precision medicine approach. RECENT FINDINGS: The current article addresses how novel omics approaches have shaped our current understanding of childhood asthma and highlights recent findings from (pharmaco)genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics studies on childhood asthma and their potential clinical implications to guide treatment in severe asthmatics. SUMMARY: Until now, omics studies have largely expanded our view on asthma heterogeneity, helped understand cellular processes underlying asthma, and brought us closer towards identifying (bio)markers that will allow the prediction of treatment responsiveness and disease progression. There is a clinical need for biomarkers that will guide treatment at the individual level, particularly in the field of biologicals. The integration of multiomics data together with clinical data could be the next promising step towards development individual risk prediction models to guide treatment. However, this requires large-scale collaboration in a multidisciplinary setting.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/diagnóstico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Antiasmáticos/farmacología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/genética , Asma/inmunología , Productos Biológicos/farmacología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Niño , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Epigenómica/métodos , Epigenómica/tendencias , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/tendencias , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Metabolómica/métodos , Metabolómica/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Proteómica/métodos , Proteómica/tendencias , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...